Skip to main content
Internet Archive's 25th Anniversary Logo

Full text of "The supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622: radio characteristics and implications for SNR statistics"

See other formats


A&A manuscript no. 

(will be inserted by hand later) 



Your thesaurus codes are: 
09 (02.16.2; 09.19.2; 13.18.2) 



ASTRONOMY 

AND 
ASTROPHYSICS 



The supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622: radio characteristics and 
impHcations for SNR statistics 



A.R. Duncan' and D.A. Green^ 



O" 

o 

Oh. 

^: 

0\' 



> 

a^, 

oo , 

o\ 

o: 
o: 
o 

Oh; 

6 



% 



Max-Planck-Institut fiir Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hiigel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany 



1 

^ Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory, Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, U.K. 

Received 23 December 1999 / Accepted 31 August 2000 



Abstract. We present new radio observations of the recently 
identified, young Galactic supernova remnant (SNR) RX 
J0852.0-4622 (G266.2-01.2) made at 1.40 GHz with a reso- 
lution of 14'9. These results, along with other radio observa- 
tions from the literature, are used to derive the extent, mor- 
phology and radio spectrum of the remnant. The possible age 
and distance to this remnant are discussed, along with the con- 
sequences of its properties - especially its low radio surface 
brightness - for statistical studies of Galactic SNRs. The ex- 



sults obtained from the 30-m Villa Elisa telescope at 1 .42 GHz 
(beamwidth -- 34'). 

The possibility of providing a more accurate age for this 



remnant was raised by Burgess & Zuber (1999), who present 



a re-analysis of nitrate abundance data from an Antarctic ice 
core. These authors find evidence for a nearby Galactic SN 
680 ± 20 years ago, in addition to the known historical super- 



novae (e.g. Clark & Stephenson 1977), although it is not possi 



tended features identified by Combi et al. ( |1999[ ) are consid- 
ered, and we conclude that these are probably unrelated to the 
new remnant. If RX 10852.0^622 is nearby, as is suggested 
by the available y-ray data, then the range of intrinsic radio lu- 
minosities for SNRs of the same diameter may be much larger 
than was previously thought. 



ble to link this new SN definitively with RX J0852.0-4622. 

In this paper, we examine three sets of radio continuum 
data from the Parkes telescope, at frequencies of 1.40, 2.42 and 
4.85 GHz. We use these data to further investigate the radio 
structure of RX 10852.0^622. Implications of the radio char- 
acteristics of this remnant for statistical studies of SNRs are 
then considered. 



Key words: Polarisation 
continuum: general 



ISM: supernova remnants - Radio 2. Radio data 



1. Introduction 



The radio data presented here come from three principal 
sources, at frequencies of 4.85, 2.42 and 1.40 GHz. Charac- 
teristics of these data are given in Table |l[ 

First, 4.85-GHz data have been obtained from the Parkes- 



Recently, Aschenbach ( 1 998 ) reported the discovery of a young 
supernova remnant (SNR) - designated RX 10852.0^622 - 
from high-energy X-ray data from the ROSAT All-Sky Sur- 
vey. This new SNR appears ne ar the southeastern bound ary of 



the Vela rem nant (e .g. Milne |1995| ; Aschenbach et al. 
Duncan et al. 



1995 



1996 1, appearing in X-rays (with £ > 1.3 keV) 



as a nearly circular "ring" approximately 2° in angular diam- 
eter. Around the circumference of this ring are a number of 
enhancements in the X-ray emission, the most prominent of 
which appears near the northwestern perimeter The available 
X-ray and y-ray data show the remnant to be comparatively 
young, with an age of < 1500 yr (lyudin et al. 1998^ Aschen- 



MIT-NRAO (PMN) survey images (Griffith & Wright |1993[ ). 
These images were observed using the 64-m Parkes radio tele- 
scope, and have an angular resolution of approximately 5'. Pro- 
cessing of the PMN observations has removed large-scale in- 
formation (> 1°) from the data. Nevertheless, the PMN im- 
ages are a useful source of higher resolution information, and 
are often able to trace structures of large angular size through 
associated smaller-scale emission components (e.g. Duncan et 
al 



1997) 



Second, 2.42-GHz data surrounding RX J0852.0-4622 
have been observed as part of a larger survey presented by Dun- 



bach et al. |1999| ) 



can et al. (1995). These data have a resolution of 10'4 and in- 



Following from this X-ray detection, Combi et al. (199S) 
reported a radio detection of the SNR from the 2.42-GHz data 
of Duncan et al. (1995). These authors present spatially fil- 
tered data from the Parkes 2.42-GHz survey, along with re- 



Send ojfprint requests to: A.R. Duncan 
(rduncan@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de) 



elude linear polarisation information. Some results from these 
data pertaining to the Vela region have been presented by Dun- 
can et al. (1996). These data were used by Combi et al. ( 1999| ) 
to make the radio detection of RX J0852. 0^622. 

Third, 1 .40-GHz observations of the region containing the 
remnant were obtained in 1996 September, as part of a larger 
survey of the Vela region at this frequency. Some of the se dat a 
have already been used by other authors (e.g. Sault et al. 1999). 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX 10852.0^622 



Table 1. Details of the radio observations of RX J0852.0-4622. 
Note that the PMN survey data contain no information on scale- 
sizes of ~ 1 ° and larger The rms noise is quoted per beam area. 



Frequency 


rms noise 


Angular 


Stokes 


Data origin 


(/GHz) 


(/mJy) 


resolution 






1.40 


20 


1419 


I,Q.U 


this paper 


2.42 


17 


10^4 


I,QM 


2.42-GHz survey 


4.85 


8 


5' 


1 


PMN survey 



The observing procedure employed for these 1.40-GHz 
data was analogous to that used for the 2.42-GHz survey (Dun- 



can et al. 1995). The telescope was scanned over a regularly- 



spaced coordinate grid, at a rate of 6° per minute, until the re- 
gion of interest had been completely covered. This procedure 
was then repeated, scanning the telescope in the orthogonal 
direction. Stokes-/, Q and U data were recorded. The source 
PKS B1934-638 was used as the primary gain calibrator for 
the observations. The flux density of this source was assumed 
to be 14.90 Jy at a frequency of 1.40 GHz. The source 3C138 
was also observed, in order to calibrate the absolute polarisa- 
tion position-angles. The intrinsic polarisation position-angle 
of 3C138 is 169° (Tabara & Inoue |l98(]| ). After the calculation 
and subtraction of appropriate "baselevels" from each scan, 
each pair of orthogonally-scanned maps was combined. 

3. Location and morphology 

The radio emission from RX J0852. 0^622 is superposed upon 
a highly structured region of the Vela remnant. Much of this 
confusing emission is of similar surface brightness to that seen 
from the new SNR. Furthermore, the very bright, thermal re- 
gion RCW 38 lies almost adjacent to the southeastern bound- 
ary of RX 10852.0^622. The peak flux of RCW 38 is approx- 
imately 150 Jy beam^' in the 2.42-GHz data. 

The presence of this confusing radio structure, both thermal 
and non-thermal, meant that RX J0852. 0-4622 was not recog- 
nised as an SNR from pre-existing radio observations of the 
region. Prior to the X-ray discovery of RX 10852.0^622 the 
non-thermal emission in this region was thought to emanate 
from the Vela SNR. 



3.1. The 2.42-GHz morphology 



The filtered 2.42-GHz image presented by Combi et al. (1999) 
clearly shows the SNR to have a shell-like radio morphology. 
This is even apparent in unfiltered maps of the region, such as 
that presented in Fig. nl Indeed, the emission now known to be 
associated with RX 10852.0^622 can be recognised in the ra- 



dio images presented by Duncan et al. (1995, 1996). Combi et 



al. (1999) also identify several additional features within their 



radio image, designated "A" through "D", which they suggest 
may represent extensions to the radio shell. These will be con- 
sidered in more detail in Sect. iA . It should be noted that - 
possibly as a result of their filtering procedure - the 2.42-GHz 



image presented by Combi et al. (1999) does not show either 
the H II region RCW 38, or the bright, non-thermal emission 
from Vela-X to the west. 

Fig. shows a spatially-filtered image of the region sur- 
rounding RX J0852. 0-4622. This image has been filtered using 



the "bgf" algorithm (e.g. Sofue & Reich 1979 1, implemented 



within the NOD2 software package. A number of filtering res- 
olutions were used, and it was (qualitatively) determined that 
the emission from RX 10852.0^622 was optimally enhanced 
with a filtering resoluti on of a pproximately 30' to 40' (in agree- 
ment with Combi et al. |1999| ). 

A filtering resolution of 40' was used for the radio data pre- 
sented in Fig. H This figure shows both the emission from 
RX J0852. 0-4622 and the confusing structure more clearly. 
Comparing Fig. ^ with the unfiltered data presented in Fig. |l| 
it can be seen that removal of the large-scale structure does not 
have a major effect on the appearance of the field. 

The radio image of the new remnant is dominated by two 
opposing arcs. Some fainter radio emission is visible on the 
remnant's western side, although there is no obvious counter- 
part to the east. The brightest section of the radio shell lies to 
the northwest, and appears approximately coincident with the 
brightest region of the X-ray image. Comparing the radio with 
the X-ray emission (Fig. ^ lower panel), we see that the distri- 
butions of both are generally similar, at least in as much as can 
be discerned from the cluttered radio field. 



3.2. The 4.85-GHz PMN data 

Fig. ^ shows data from the 4.85-GHz PMN survey from the 
same region as shown in the previous figures. Although this 
survey is not optimised for extended sources, the northern and 
southern sections of the limb-brightened shell stand out clearly. 

The black circle near the centre of Fig.Js] fits the outer 
boundary of the radio emission from both Figs Hand B^ well, and 
represents what we take to be the outer boundary of the radio 
emission from RX 10852.0^622 1 . This boundary is 1 .°8 ± 0.°2 
in angular diameter, and is ce ntred o n the X-ray centre of the 
SNR (as given by Aschenbach 1998 1. Within the uncertainties, 
this diameter is in agreement with that estimated by Combi et 
al. ( 1999 ), who quote a value of 2.°1, based upon the (lower 
resolution) Parkes 2.42-GHz data alone. 

Both the radio and X-ray data are consistent with a remnant 
centred on Galactic longitude 266.°2, latitude — 1.°2. Thus, we 
suggest a Galactic designation of G266.2-01.2 for this SNR. 



3.3. Confusing structure within the field 

As can be seen from Fig. 0, a good deal of additional radio 
structure is visible in the vicinity of RX J0852. 0^622. Over 
the remnant itself, most of this structure takes the form of two 
diffuse "filaments", each of which is ~ 20' wide. These fil- 
aments are oriented approximately north-south over the new 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622 



-45 00 



-46 00 







-47 00 - 



30 - 



-48 00 - 



RA (J2000) 

Fig. 1. Unfiltered, Parkes 2.42-GHz survey image of RX J0852. 0-4622. Although confused with larger structures, radio emission 
from the SNR - approximately 1P8 in diameter in the centre of the image - is clearly visible. To the west, the brighter emission 
associated with Vela-X is visible. To the southeast lies the bright Hll region RCW 38. The angular resolution is 10.'4, and the 
rms noise is approximately 17 mJy beam^^ The grey-scale wedge is labelled in units of Jy beam^^ Contour levels are: 5, 10, 
20, 50 and 100 Jy beam- 1. 



SNR. Beyond the northern boundary of the remnant, the fila- 
ments begin to curve towards the west. 

From larger images of th e Vela regio n, such as have been 
presented by Duncan et al. (1995, |1996|), these filaments are 



known to curve around Vela-X, forming almost a full quadrant 
of a circle. The east ern ar c (as seen in Fig. ||) is highly polarised 



(e.g. Duncan et al. 1996), and appears to represent the current 



boundary of the shock from the Vela supernova event. 

Interestingly, the confusing filaments from Fig. Q are almost 
completely absent from the PMN data. This is because of the 
observing and data processing procedures used as part of the 
PMN survey, coupled with the fact that the confusing filaments 
lie approximately parallel to the scanning direction of the tele- 
scope over the region of sky containing RX J0852. 0^622. 



3.4. Extensions to the radio shell? 



As mentioned in Sect. 3.1, Combi et al. (1999) identify a num- 



ber of additional features within their radio image. These fea- 
tures were designated "A" through "D" in Fig. 1 of their pa- 
per, and apparently extend for relatively large angular distances 
beyond the edge of the RX J0852.0^622 sh ell (up to almost 
twice the radius of the remnant). Combi et al. ( 1999 ) argue that 
these features may represent extensions to the radio shell of 



RX J0852.0-4622 (c.f. Aschenbach et al. |1995D . It is of inter- 
est to consider these in more detail. 

Examining the 2.42-GHz radio image of Combi et 



al. (1999), we find that radio features "A" and "C" appear to 
be sections of the much more extensive "arc" structures dis- 
cussed in Sect. 3.3. These arcs can be traced in Fig. 0for sev- 



eral degrees, up to the northern edge of the figure (i.e., beyond 
the boundary of RX J0852. 0^622). Larger radio images of the 
region show that these features continue for many degrees fur- 
ther, in both total-power and polarised intensity. Feature "B" 
appears to be an isolated, slightly extended source with no ob- 
vious connection to the new remnant (even in the unfiltered im- 
age presented in Fig. |l]). Finally, feature "D" correspond s to th e 
X-ray feature "D/D'" as identified by Aschenbach et al. ( 1995 ). 
Aschenbach ( 1998[ ) notes that this feature is also a source of 
hard X-rays, but that this emission is associated with a much 
lower temperature spectrum than that from RX J0852. 0-4622. 

We suggest, therefore, that none of the possible "exten- 
sions" identified by Combi et al. (1999) are associated with 
RX J0852.0^622. 

A further argument against an association between these 
features and the new remnant is that the boundary of the 
RX J0852.0^622 shock is well fitted (in both the PMN and 
Parkes 2.42-GHz survey data) by a circle. This is consistent 
with the radio morphologies of other young shell SNRs, such 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX 10852.0^622 



-45 00 



-46 00 



o 



-47 00 



-48 00 




56*" 52'" 48" 

RA (J2000) 



44"" 40"" 



30 



-45 00 



o 
o 
o 



H 



30 



-46 00 



30 



-47 00 



30 



-48 00 




9"4 



RA (J2000) 



Fig. 2. The optimally-filtered, Parkes 2.42-GHz survey image of RX J0852. 0^622. A filtering beamwidth of 40' has been used, 
such that larger-scale emission components have been eliminated. The SNR is now more obvious, although it is still heavily 
confused with emission from the much larger Vela remnant. The angular resolution is 10'4, and the rms noise is approximately 
17 mJy beam^^ The grey-scale wedge is labelled in units of Jy beam^'. The upper panel shows radio contours, with levels of: 5, 
1 0, 20, 50 and 1 00 Jy beam^ ' . The lower panel shows contours of X-ray intensity - from the 1 2' resolution images of Snowden 



et al. ( |1997| ) - with levels of: 0.30, 0.40, 0.52, 0.65, 0.80, 1.0 and 1.2 x 10"^ counts s" 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622 



-45 00 



o 
o 
o 



u 

Ed 
R 



-46 00 



-47 00 



-48 00 







9°4° 



9-0° 



56" 



52- 



RA (J2000) 



48° 



44" 



40° 



Fig. 3. An image taken from the 4.85-GHz PMN survey, centred on the remnant RX J0852. 0^622. The angular resolution is 
~ 5', and the rms noise is approximately 8 mJy beam~^. The grey-scale wedge is labelled in units of Jy beam^^ The white 
contours denote intensities of: 0.2, 0.8, 3.0, 10, 30 and 80 Jy beam^^ The black circle (see Sect. 3.2) is centred on the X-ray 
coordinates of the source and is 1 .°8 in angular diameter. 



as Kepler (Dickel et al. |1988[ ), Tycho (Dickel et al. 1991[ ), and 
the remnant of SN1006 (Reynolds & Gilmore p^93| ), although 
we caution that RX J0852.0-4622 is considerably fainter than 
these and other young remnants. We also note that the higher 
resolution PMN image (Fig. g), although not optimised for ex- 
tended emission, shows no evidence for any co nnections be- 
tween the features noted by Combi et al. ( 1999 ) and the shell 
of the new remnant. 



The radio spectral indices of pulsar emissions are generally 
much steeper than the <; —0.7 estimated above for the source 
(e.g. Taylor et al. 1993). Furthermore, a flux of 136 ± 11 mJy 
at a frequency of 4.85 GHz would be exceptionally high for 
a pulsar. It is much more likely, then, that the PMN J0853- 
4620 source is extragalactic in origin, rather than associated 
with RX J0852.0-4622. 



3.6. Radio spectrum 



3.5. The quasi-central source 

The PMN image shows that a point-like (i.e. unresolved at 
a resolution of ~ 5') source lies approximately 15f5 east of 
the apparent centre of the remnant. This source is not co- 
incident with either of the two compact X-ray sources near 
the centre of the remnant that are discussed by Aschenbach 



et al. (1999). The PMN survey source catalogue (Wright et 
al. 119941) Usts this source as PMN 10853^620, with a 4.85- 



GHz flux of 136 ± 1 1 mJy. Being relatively faint, our ability to 
detect PMN J0853-4620 in the 2.42-GHz data is compromised 
somewhat by confusion, coupled with beam dilution. Never- 
theless, we can establish the 2.42-GHz flux to be ^ 200 mJy. 
This leads to a spectral index for this source of a Jj —0.7 (with 
S oc v"). 



The presence of the confusing structure noted in Sect. 3.3 
makes accurate estimates of the integrated remnant flux den- 
sity difficult. The values for the flux density of the SNR given 
below were estimated by integrating the emission within the 
boundary of RX J0852. 0-4622, as defined by the circle seen 
in Fig. H (lower panel). The integrated area extended approx- 
imately one beamwidth beyond this circle, in order to include 
all the flux from the shell. The base level was determined from 
flux minima near the centre of the remnant, as well as beyond 
the eastern and southwestern edges of the shell. Fluxes con- 
tributed by the confusing "filaments" seen to the western and 



eastern sides of the remnant (as discussed in Sect. 3.3) were es 



timated and subtracted from the total, integrated flux. Note that 
the uncertainties in the integrated flux values are dominated by 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX 10852.0^622 



baselevel uncertainty, rather than by uncertainties in the flux 
estimates of the confusing structure. 

We estimate the integrated fluxes of RX J0852.0^622 at 
2.42 and 1 .40 GHz to be 33 ± 6 Jy and 40 ± 10 Jy, respectively. 
These values lead to a very uncertain estimate of the spectral 
index, with a = -0.4 ± 0.5 (S o= v"). To better establish the 
spectral index of the remnant, the method of "T-T" plots was 



used (e.g. Turtle et al. 1962) 



Estimates of the remnant spectral index were made from 
both filtered and unfiltered images, using the T-T plot tech- 
nique. The northern section of the shell was found to have 
a consistent, non-thermal index of —0.40 ±0.15. The south- 
ern section of emission exhibited a much flatter spectrum of 
—0.1 ±0.1. We believe this latter value to be unreliable, due to 
the proximity of the southern section of the shell to the bright 
H II region RCW 38 and its associated emission. At the lower 
angular resolution of the 1.40-GHz data (to which the 2.42- 
GHz data are also smoothed, for the purposes of spectral index 
calculation), some of this thermal emission becomes confused 
with the southern arc of RX 10852.0^622. We suggest that the 
value determined for the northern shell section better represents 
the new remnant's radio emission. 

Extrapolating the measured integrated flux to a frequency 
of 1 GHz (using a spectral index of —0.40 ±0.15), we de- 
termine a value of 47 ± 12 Jy, leading to an average sur- 
face brightness at this latter frequency of (6.1 ± 1.5) x 
10^^^ W m^^ Hz^' sr^^ The above values are summarised 
in Table 




56" 52" 48' 

RA (J2000) 

Fig. 4. Grey-scale image showing the polarised intensities 
across the field at 2.42 GHz, with a resolution of 14'9. 
The 2.42-GHz Stokes-Q and U data have rms variations of 
~ 23 mJy beam^' at this resolution. The grey-scale im- 
age is blanked wherever the polarised intensity falls below 
45 mJy beam^ ' . Orientations of the tangential components of 
the magnetic fields are also shown. These angles have been cal- 
culated from the 1.40- and 2.42-GHz data, assuming that the 
vector angles vary linearly with X^. Errors in the derived an- 
gles are generally ^ 10°. A vector is plotted every 6', wherever 
both the 1 .40- and 2.42-GHz polarised intensities (at 14f9 reso- 
lution) exceed 0.1 Jy beam^'. The grey-scale wedge is labelled 
in units of Jy beam" ' . 



4. Polarimetric observations 

We have examined the 1 .40- and 2.42-GHz polarimetric data in 
the field surrounding RX J0852. 0^622. These data have been 
used to estimate the Faraday rotation measures (RMs) across 
the field, and to calculate the polarisation position-angles at 
zero wavelength (thereby estimating the orientations of the tan- 
gential components of the magnetic fields within the regions of 
polarised emission). Note that these estimates assume the po- 
larisation position-angles to vary linearly with A,^. 

The polarised intensities from the 2.42-GHz data are shown 
in Fig. H at the lower resolution of 14'9. Superposed upon this 
grey-scale image are the orientations of the tangential compo- 
nent of the magnetic field. The RMs derived across the field are 
shown in Fig. |[ 

The large circle shows the boundary of the SNR 
RX J0852. 0^622. Much of the polarised emission visible 
within the circle does not appear to be associated with the new 
SNR. For example, the polarisation detected from the eastern 
half of RX J0852. 0-4622 is clearly associated with the promi- 
nent, eastern arc of total-power emission. The only region of 
RX J0852. 0^622 to potentially exhibit polarised emission is 
the northern section of the shell. If associated with the new 
remnant, the northern arc appears polarised to a level of ap- 
proximately 20% at 2.42 GHz. Other regions of the SNR ex- 



hibit no polarised emission (such as the southern section of the 
shell), or are confused with polarised structure from Vela. 

The magnetic field vectors on the north side of the shell 
appear jumbled, with no clear orientation evident. This is in 
contrast to the field orientations in other young, shell-type su- 
pernova remnants, which are predominantly radial; e.g. Tycho 



(Wood et al. 1992), Kepler (Matsui et al. 1984) and SN1006 



(Reynolds & Gilmore 1993) 



However, it is questionable whether the detected polarised 
emission in this northern section of the shell is attributable to 
RX J0852.0-4622. The appearance of much of this RM struc- 
ture is similar to that seen from the Vela emission, beyond 
the RX J0852. 0^622 shell's northwestern perimeter. Further- 
more, there is no discontinuity in either the RM values or the 
magnetic field orientations near the boundary of the shell. We 
suggest, therefore, that the polarised emission seen throughout 
Fig. originates entirely from the Vela remnant. We note that 
this interpretation is also consistent with the lack of polarisa- 
tion observed from the southern arc of the RX J0852.0-4622 
shell. 

The fractional polarisation of the northern arc must then be 
< 20% at 2.42 GHz. As noted above, we detect no polarisation 
in the vicinity of the bright, southern section of the shell, to a 
(5a) limit of approximately 5% at 2.42 GHz. We note that these 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622 



■■■■-nnUDDU nnncnQn.-Dnn 

-□nnnflB" ■ ■ ■ ■ " nnnanon-- 




RA (J8000) 

Fig. 5. The derived rotation measure (RM) from the 2.42- and 
1.40-GHz data, assuming that the vector angles vary Hnearly 
with X^. Filled squares represent positive RM values, while 
empty squares represent negative values. The size of each 
square is proportional to the magnitude of the RM, with the 
maximum size corresponding to ~ ±51 rad m^^. The errors in 
RM values are ^ 5 rad m^^. A square is plotted every 4'. Data 
have been blanked wherever the 1.40- or 2.42-GHz polarised 
intensity (at 14'9 resolution) falls below 0.1 Jy beam^'. 

Table 2. Characteristics of the radio emission from 
RX J0852.0-4622, determined from the Parkes data. The 
spectral index measured for the southern limb of the SNR 
appears to be confused with nearby thermal emission. The 
surface brightness is given in units of W m^^ Hz^' sr^' . 



Angular diameter 

Integrated 1.40-GHz flux density 

Integrated 2.42-GHz flux density 

anorthern (from T-T plots) 

asouthem (from T-T plots) 
Integrated flux density at 1 GHz 
Surface brightness at 1 GHz 



1P8±0P2 

40±10Jy 

33±6Jy 

-0.40 ±0.15 

-0.1±0.1(?) 

47±12Jy 

(6.1±1.5)xl0- 



22 



low fractional polarisations are not inconsistent with the polari- 
metric properties of other young shells, which exhibit fractional 
polarisations of <; 15% when the emission is well resolved. 

5. Discussion 

5.1. RX J0852.0-4622: young or not so young? 

Several observations of RX J0852. 0^622 suggest that it is a 
young SNR. Most notably, both the X-ray temperatures de- 



rived by Aschenbach (1998) and the y-ray work of lyudin et 



al. (1998) imply an age of ^ 1500 yr Further, the more re- 



agreement with the approximately circular radio appearance of 
the remnant; a characteristic exhibited by other young, shell- 
type SNRs. Even the cautious upper distance limit of approxi- 



mately 1 kpc provided by Aschenbach (1998), which leads to 
a linear diameter of ~ 30 pc, implies the age of this remnant 
cannot be more than a few thousand years. 

However, there are some radio properties of this remnant 
are difficult to reconcile with those of other young SNRs. 

- The radio shell is far from complete. The radio image of 
RX J0852. 0^622 is composed primarily of two, oppos- 
ing regions of emission. This is in contrast to other young, 
shell-type SNRs, which exhibit essentially complete radio 
shells. We note a possible resemblance to the structure of 
SN1006, however, which also shows opposing arcs of emis- 
sion. 

- The radio emission from this new SNR is of relatively low 
surface brightness. The mean radio surface brightness of 
this new remnant at 1 GHz (see Table g) is a factor of 
5 lower than that of SN1006. This is significant, because 
the SN1006 remnant has the lowest surface brightness of 
all the young, shell-type SNRs in current catalogues (e.g. 
Green 1998 ) - see the further discussion in Sect. p3| . 

- The radio spectral index of —0.40 ±0.15 determined herein 
for RX J0852. 0-4622 is flatter than those of ot her yo ung 
shells, which have indices of ^ —0.6 (e.g. Green 1988). 



It is possible that some of the unusual radio properties of 
RX J0852.0^622 may result from the SNR expanding into 
a hot, low-d ensity region of the interstellar medium; Aschen- 
bach (1998) determines an upper limit to this density of ap- 
proximately 0.06 cm^^. If so, this would emphasise the the role 
played by environmental effects on the detectability of young 
radio remnants. Alternatively, this SNR may be just beginning 
to "turn on" at radio wavelengths, although this scenario may 
be difficult to reconcile with the very incomplete radio shell. 

Further insights into the unusual radio properties of this 
SNR must await more detailed investigations of the character- 
istics of both the remnant and the environment into which it is 
expanding. 

5.2. The distance to RX 10852.0^622 

Unfortunately, the distance to RX J085 2. 0^ 622 is highly un- 
certain. The X-ray data of Aschenbach (1998 ) provide an upper 
limit of approximately 1 kpc, based on the lack of absorption, 
but suggest that the remnant's distance could be as small as 
200 pc. This lower limit is based upon a comparison of the new 
remnant's surface brightness with that of SN1006. However, 
SN1006 is atypically faint for known, young. Galactic SNRs 
(this is further discussed in Sect. p3). 

The y-ray data discussed by lyudin et al. 



cent discussion of the y-ray observations by Aschenbach et 
al. ( 1999 ) suggest the remnant is ^ 700 years old. This is in 



and As- 
chenbach et al. ( |1999| ) suggest an age of approximately 700 yr, 
from a comparison of the observed ^^Ti line flux with that ex- 
pected from SN models, which corresponds to a distance of 
approximately 200 pc. However, the interpretation of the y-ray 
detection requires the assumption of both the supernova shock 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX 10852.0^622 



velocity and the '*'*Ti yield. lyudin et al. (1998) note that in- 
creases in either of these quantities will lead to an increase in 
the derived distance of the remnant. 

We have examined 21 -cm H I o bserva tions in the region of 
RX J0852.0-4622, from Kerr et al. ( |1986| ), in an attempt to find 
any correlating features. However, since the remnant lies in a 
complex region in Vela, no associated features in H I could be 
found. 



The ice core data of Burgess & Zuber ( 1999 1 may be able 
to provide an accurate age for RX J0852. 0-4622, but these data 
are not able to constrain the distance to the SNR without further 
assumptions. Furthermore, as noted above, it is not possible to 
definitively associate the additional nitrate spike with this SNR. 
If we assume the age of ~ 700 yr determined by Burgess & 
Zuber (1999) to be accurate, then assuming an upper limit to 
the mean shock velocity of lO'* km s^^ places the remnant at a 
distance of ^ 460 pc, with a linear diameter of ^ 15 pc. 

A value of 10^ km s^' was nominated as an upper limit 



to the shock velocity by Aschenbach et al. ( 1999 ), based on 
their analysis of the X-ray data. Should the mean shock velocity 
exceed this value, the remnant would lie at a distance of <; 
460 pc, with a correspondingly larger linear diameter. 

In summary, the distance is very poorly constrained by 
current observational data. Unfortunately, since the remnant is 
faint, is not detected optically, and is in a complex region, many 
direct techniques used to determine the distance to SNRs are 
not applicable in this case (e.g. H I absorption, association with 
other H I features or molecular clouds, or optical studies). Nev- 
ertheless, the radio properties of this remnant, even with the 
present uncertainty in its age and size, have some interesting 
implications for statistical studies of Galactic SNRs, which are 
discussed in the next section. 



and 3C58). This would have important consequences for statis- 
tical studies of Galactic SNRs (see Green 1991 ), as the range 
of E - or, equivalently, luminosity - for a given D may be even 
wider than was previously thought. This in turn would imply 
that the observational selection effect of faint SNRs being dif- 
ficult to detect is important, not only for old SNRs, but also for 
young SNRs. The low radio surface brightness of RX J0852.0- 
4622 indicates that a fraction of young SNRs may be faint at ra- 
dio wavelengths. The available sample of young SNRs (i.e. his- 
torical events) is small, however, so it is not possible to mean- 
ingfully estimate this proportion. 

On the other hand, if the remnant is as distant as 1 kpc, 
then although it is faint for it's diameter of ^ 30 pc, it is not 
strikingly unusual. 



6. Conclusions 

We have presented various radio observations of the newly 
recognised SNR RX J0852. 0-4622, which clai'ify its size and 
morphology. Several features possibly associated with the rem- 
nant by Combi et al. ( 1999 1 are examined, and it is concluded 
that these are probably unrelated to RX J0852. 0^622. 

Although the distance and age of RX 10852.0^622 are 
not well determined, its faintness has some interesting implica- 
tions for the statistical study of SNRs, namely that the surface- 
brightness limits of current radio surveys may miss faint, young 
remnants, as well as faint, old remnants. Clearly an accurate 
distance determination for this SNR is important, although this 
is difficult, given its faintness and the fact that it lies in a com- 
plex region of the sky, confused with emission from the much 
larger Vela SNR. 



5.3. Statistical implications 

Fig. ^ shows a surface-brightness versus diameter plot for 
Galactic SNRs for which there are reasonable distances avail- 



able (Green |1984 |1991i |199§). RX J0852.0-4622 is plotted on 
this figure with a range of diameters corresponding to distances 
from 200 pc to 1 kpc. The surface brightness of RX J0852.0- 
4622, of El GHz -- 6 X 10^22 w m^^ Hz"' sr"', is faint for a 
known Galactic SNR - among the faintest 20% of catalogued 
remnants. This is less than the nominal completeness limit 



of many radio surveys (e.g. Green 1991). Note that although 



most faint remnants are thought to be old, that the remnant 
of the SN of AD1006 is also faint, with Ei ghz -^ 3 x lO^^i 
W m-2 Hz-i sr-'. We also note that, whilst RX J0852.0-4622 
is one of the fainter remnants to appear on the E ~ D plot, the 
only other remnant detected in '^'^Ti y-ray emission is Cas A, 
which has the highest surface brightness. 

From Fig. n, it is clear that the properties of RX J0852.0- 
4622 are very unusual if it lies at the smaller distances sug- 
gested by the y-ray data. If the SNR is at a distance < 300 pc, 
its diameter is less than 10 pc, but its surface brightness is 
two or more orders of magnitude less than other known young 
SNRs with similar diameters (e.g. Kepler's SN, Tycho's SN, 



Acknowledgements. The Australia Telescope is funded by the Com- 
monwealth of Australia for operation as a National Facility man- 
aged by CSIRO. ARD is an Alexander von Humboldt research Fel- 
low and thanks the Stiftung for their support. The authors gratefully 
acknowledge R Slane for helpful comments and suggestions on the 
manuscript. 

References 

Aschenbach B., 1998, Nat 396, 141 
Aschenbach B., Egger R., Trumper J., 1995, Nat 373, 587 
Aschenbach B., lyudin A.F, Schonfelder V., 1999, A&A 350, 997 
Burgess C.R, Zuber K., 1999, New Scientist 163, 2204 (Sept. 18), p. 7 
Clark D.H., Stephenson F.R., 1977, "The Historical Supernovae" 

(Pergamon, London) 
Combi J.A., Romero G.E., Benagha R, 1999, ApJ 519, L177 
Dickel J.R., Sault R., Arendt R.G., Korista K.T., Matsui Y, 1988, ApJ 

330, 254 
Dickel J.R., van Breugel W.J.M., Strom R.G., 1991, AJ 101, 2151 
Duncan A.R., Stewart R.T., Haynes R.F., Jones K.L., 1995, MNRAS 

277, 36 
Duncan A.R., Stewart R.T., Haynes R.F., Jones K.L., 1996, MNRAS 

280, 252 
Duncan A.R., Stewart R.T., Haynes R.F., Jones K.L., 1997, MNRAS 

287, 722 



A.R. Duncan & D.A. Green: The supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622 













1 ' 






»Cas A 






>; 












O 










" 






♦ Crab 


Nebula 




■ 


CO 












O 










" 










. 


■ 






♦ Kepler 




■ 


1 CB 

m T 

7 ° 






+ Tycho 
♦3C58 




: 


s 

< 








• 


■ 


s 










. 


o 








_ 




1 

o 








• 


: 










♦ SN1006 


■ 












. 


N 








, 




o 










; 








300~i]c 


1 kpc 
RX J085a.0-4623 


- 










. 




1 
o 


: 






• 


_i , — . 



D /pc 

Fig. 6. A surface-brightness vs. diameter (E — D) plot for Galactic SNRs with relatively well known distance. RX J0852. 0^622 
is plotted for a range of distances from 200 pc to 1 kpc, and known young SNRs are labelled. 



Green D.A., 1984, MNRAS 209, 449 

Green D.A., 1988, in "Genesis and propagation of cosmic rays", eds 

M.M. Shapiro, J.P. Wefel, p. 205 (Reidel, Dordrecht) 
Green D.A., 1991, PASP 103, 209 

Green D.A., 1998, 'A Catalogue of Galactic Supernova Remnants 
(1998 September version)', MuUard Radio Astronomy Observa- 
tory, Ca mbridge, United Kingdom (available on the World-W ide- 
Web at "http://www.mrao . cam. ac .uk/surveys/snrs/") 
Griffith M.R., Wright A.E., 1993, AJ 105, 1666 
lyudin A.R, Schonfelder V., Bennett K., et al., 1998, Nat 396, 142 
Kerr F.J., Bowers PR, KeiT M., Jackson PD., 1986, AA&S 66, 373 
Matsui Y, Long K.S., Dickel J.R., Greisen E.W., 1984, ApJ 287, 295 
Milne D.K., 1995, MNRAS 277, 1435 
Reynolds S.P, Gilmore D.M., 1993, AJ 106, 272 
Sault R.J., Bock D.C.-J., Duncan A.R., 1999, A&AS 139, 387 
Schonfelder V., Bloemen H., CoUmar W., et al., 2000, ^4x1 
Gamma-Ray Line Emission from Gas A and RXJ0852.0-4622 
/ GROJ0852^642. In: Proc. 5th Compton Symposium (AIP, in 
press) 



Snowden S.L., Egger R., Freyberg M.J., et al., 1997, ApJ 485, 125 

Sofue Y, Reich W., 1979, A&AS 38, 251 

Tabara H., Inoue M., 1980, A&AS 39, 379 

Taylor J.H., Manchester R.N., Lyne A.G., 1993, ApJS 88, 529 

Turtle A.J., Pugh J.R, Kenderdine S., Pauliny-Toth I.I.K., 1962, MN- 
RAS 124, 297 

Wood C.A., Mufson S.L., Dickel J.R., 1992, AJ 103, 1338 

Wright A.E., Griffith M.R., Burke B.R, Ekers R.D., 1994, ApJS 91, 
111 

Note added in pr oof: The authors note a recent paper by 
Schonfelder et al. ( 200C ), which concludes that the y-ray detec- 
tion of RX J0852.0-4622 is less statistically significant than was 
first thought.